Da vinci code movie actors movie#
I've talked to people who have watched the movie but didn't read the book. He assumed that even after eliminating things from the book, people would still buy it.
![da vinci code movie actors da vinci code movie actors](https://www.pastposters.com/cw3/assets/product_full/R/da-vinci-code-cinema-quad-movie-poster-(teaser-4).jpg)
So why is it that I never got the hair-tingling feeling when the truth about Jesus is revealed, or when the twist at the end is revealed, or the final resting place of Mary Magdalene is revealed? Those scenes should have been amazing, and they just weren't.Ģ.
Da vinci code movie actors series#
Even the "Harry Potter" movies, which are based on one of the best selling series of all time, treat developments as if no one is expecting them. Think of "The Sixth Sense." Having watched it several times, I know how it's going to end but my hair still sticks on end when the twist is revealed. Don't present major story arcs as matter of fact. Regardless, you have to make the movie as if you're revealing things for the first time. Hell, there's probably people out there who don't even know that the story is about a cover-up to hide "the truth" about Jesus and Mary Magdalene getting it on and having a baby. I read the book two or three years ago, and honestly I had already forgotten the twist at the end. He assumed people already knew the ending. And the storyline with the Opus Dei leader is all but muted.ġ. Silas, who was super creepy in the book, is watered down here, and the main bad guy is nothing at all too intimidating. The action scenes are dull, and the bad guys even duller.
![da vinci code movie actors da vinci code movie actors](https://images.thestar.com/LJJMvNQmgI6yLHvSZwm9hva7c-4=/1086x805/smart/filters:cb(2700061000)/https://www.thestar.com/content/dam/thestar/entertainment/2009/12/30/10_most_important_works_of_the_decade_no_2_the_da_vinci_code/the_da_vincicode.jpeg)
The music never keeps you on edge, and the movie goes at a sluggish pace. Through the use of proper editing and musical score, you can "easily" make a dialogue-filled movie exciting and suspenseful - see the trailers for the movie as an example. The book was exciting and interesting from beginning to end I almost fell asleep in the movie. From the movie's pacing to the general sense of suspense, "The Da Vinci Code" is lacking in every way. Ron Howard, who some say plays it safe but who also turns out consistently quality films year after year, is a disaster here. Who cares if he is claustrophobic? When the time is right, he suddenly has a photographic memory? Movies have to plant seeds ahead of time.īut it's the directing that really kills the movie. The character of Robert Langdon is hardly explained, and that's bad when he's your main character. Movies have to make a more concentrated effort to do the same. The movie drops us right into the action the way the book did, but books are able to give characters more depth without taking a step back. The dialogue is so matter-of-fact that it never allows us to get engaged with the characters. So how can the acting be so bad with such a good cast? The only actor who really rose to the occasion was Ian McKellan, who apparently figured that he might as well kick ass in two of the biggest blockbusters of the year two weeks in a row (hence "X-Men: The Last Stand").
![da vinci code movie actors da vinci code movie actors](https://static01.nyt.com/images/2006/05/18/arts/18code.2.650.jpg)
Audrey Tatou isn't noticeably bad, but I've seen her do better, and Jean Reno is also substantially below par. Then we are introduced to Tom Hanks, who goes through the whole movie talking like he's reading off a teleprompter and not showing even a remote interest in appearing livid on screen. Bettany's first lines of dialogue are cringe inducing, and they only get worse from there. The movie starts off with Paul Bettany, made out to look like a religious and tortured albino, killing off a man in the Louvre. I was hoping for at least a well-directed thriller with some thought-provoking moments, a sense of urgency and some decent suspense. But, given the fact that I can't think of a single Ron Howard film that I haven't at least liked, and that Tom Hanks is one of the most consistent actors on the face of the planet, I was hoping for more. The acting? The directing? The screenplay? The visuals? Pacing? In the long run, "The Da Vinci Code" isn't a bad movie, and considering only ten to fifteen really good movies come out a year, it will probably rank around #25. It has a great cast and a good director - what possibly could go wrong? The book is exciting and thought-provoking, and the movie is one of the most anticipated films of the year. To say I was excited for "The Da Vinci Code" is like saying I'd like to see Natalie Portman naked - it goes without saying. Now available on Blu-ray and DVD ( Buy on Amazon)